Advertisement

Scandal in the palace

Scandal in the palace
Getty Images

On November 20, 2019, Queen Elizabeth II’s second son Prince Andrew, Duke of York, released a formal statement on the royal family’s official website and announced, “I have asked Her Majesty if I may step back from public duties for the foreseeable future, and she has given her permission.” So, what does this mean? Is it really just a polite way of saying that he got fired? And if so, fired from what exactly? Here’s the lowdown on Prince Andrew’s very public demotion.

This is not the first time the palace has been rocked by scandal. Here are some royal family scandals that shocked the world.

Was Andrew fired?

Was Andrew fired?
Getty Images

The day after Andrew’s announcement, the New York Post published a story claiming that Andrew didn’t merely ‘step back’ or resign. Rather, he was fired – and by his mum, Her Majesty the Queen, no less. In business and in politics, it’s not unusual for a firing to be reframed as a voluntary resignation. Either way, the employee in question is out of a job. However, it’s relevant whether the employee has been afforded latitude to paint the circumstances as voluntary. After all, being fired conjures up images of an ambush ending with the employee being escorted out by security. Resignation, however, implies that even if the employee wouldn’t have chosen to leave, the employee was able to leave on his own terms.

On one hand, it’s probably safe to assume that Andrew would not have stepped back from his duties by choice. On the other, at least he wasn’t handed his head – whether metaphorically or literally. And as we’ll see below, there’s plenty of precedent for that in the royal family.

What led to his departure

What led to his departure
Getty Images

In a word – or, rather, two – Jeffrey Epstein. “It has become clear to me over the last few days that the circumstances relating to my former association with Jeffrey Epstein has become a major disruption to my family’s work and the valuable work going on in the many organisations and charities that I am proud to support,” Andrew explained in his full statement. So, just who was Jeffrey Epstein? In case you missed the recent headlines, he was a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender who was arrested in the summer of 2019 on sex-trafficking charges; he died, allegedly of suicide, while in police custody. And there may be more to Andrew’s ‘stepping back’ than simply his ‘association’ with Epstein.

 

The friendship that toppled a royal

The friendship that toppled a royal
Getty Images

Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein met and became friends in 1999, according to the BBC. Andrew continued his friendship with Epstein even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction involving sex with a minor. The friendship continued even after Epstein’s arrest, whereupon Andrew’s initial failure to speak out against Epstein drew sharp criticism from the public. When Andrew did finally speak about Epstein, it wasn’t to express dismay over Epstein’s alleged crimes but only to say that Epstein’s behaviour was “unbecoming” and that Andrew had made an error in spending time with him.

New evidence

New evidence
Getty Images

By the time Andrew made his “stepping back” announcement, the public had a lot more information about his friendship with Epstein than Andrew may have initially realised the public would ever have privy to. Among other things, it’s become public knowledge that one of Epstein’s accusers named Andrew as complicit in Epstein’s alleged crimes. Even more damning: there are photos that seem to back up the accuser’s story.

 

A possible investigation

A possible investigation
Getty Images

The last point Andrew makes in his formal statement is this, “I am willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency with their investigations, if required.” Several weeks later, the BBC acknowledged that Prince Andrew may, at the very least, be expected to submit to an interview with law enforcement. Although Buckingham Palace has stood beside Andrew in denying the accuser’s claims, when it comes to the royal family, nothing matters quite so much as public perception. Although the US justice system presumes innocence until guilt is proven, the court of public opinion does not offer such generosity, and the threat of an investigation into Andrew’s alleged complicity in Epstein’s alleged crimes may have been more than Buckingham Palace was willing to withstand in terms of bad publicity.

Read on for the times the royal family was brutally honest with the media.

Advertisement

What is Andrew ‘stepping back’ from, exactly?

What is Andrew ‘stepping back’ from, exactly?
Getty Images

Not everyone in the royal family is a ‘working member.’ The ones who are classified as such undertake the official duties described in the royal family’s website, including appearing at engagements identified on the website’s Court Circular (e.g., national festivities, state funerals, diplomatic efforts). Only a select few are eligible for this job:

The Queen

The Queen’s children and their spouses

The children of the Queen’s children and their spouses

The Queen’s first cousins (i.e., the children of the siblings of Her Majesty’s father, King George VI) and their spouses

Although Prince Andrew is eligible as the Queen’s son, he is no longer employed in such capacity. In other words, he will no longer represent the Queen at official engagements. Of course, stepping back has been in the news a lot lately, with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle doing the same – though of their own volition and due to very different circumstances.

Prince Andrew is still a member of the royal family

Prince Andrew is still a member of the royal family
Getty Images

As disappointed as the Queen may be in her second-born son, she has not disowned or disinherited him. Nor has anyone (yet) come out and said that Andrew is no longer in line for the throne. Perhaps that’s because that line is determined entirely by birth order. In fact, many who stand in the line of succession are not ‘working members’ of the royal family either. That includes Andrew’s daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, neither of whose status is affected by Andrew’s ‘stepping back’.

Check out these rarely seen photos of royal siblings.

Has anyone else ever stepped back?

Has anyone else ever stepped back?
Getty Images

It’s been said that Andrew’s announcement is ‘unprecedented’. Technically, that’s true, but it is not unprecedented for a member of the royal family to remove themselves from the role they are currently serving. In fact, it’s not even unprecedented for the King to do so. That’s precisely what happened when King Edward VIII abdicated the throne in 1936 after less than a year. What happened? The Church of England denounced his decision to marry an American divorcée, and as he said in a radio address, “I have found it impossible to carry on the heavy burden of responsibility and to discharge the duties of king, as I would wish to do, without the help and support of the woman I love.”

Has anyone ever been fired?

Has anyone ever been fired?
Getty Images

The short answer: yes. When Princess Diana and Prince Charles finalised their divorce in 1996, Diana was officially ‘let go’ from her duties as a working member of the royal family, including her involvement in nearly 100 charities. Diana was also stripped of her right to be styled as Her Royal Highness, although she retained the title Diana, Princess of Wales.

Princess Diana is one of the most beloved royals of all time, here are some “facts” about her that just aren’t true.

Never miss a deal again - sign up now!

Connect with us: